Thought inducing....

This is going to be a short entry today, but thought that it would invoke some thought from you all.  Why is it OK for the government to take away our rights a little at a time, but allow illegals to choose what laws they follow and then support them in their quest to violate our laws.  I just don't get it.

Thought for the day: If you are for restricting my 2nd Amendment rights, I'm for restricting your 1st Amendment rights.  Think about that one.

2nd Amendment and my thoughts about it.

Ok people, I'm a bit pissed. The more and more I think about this issue, which is a hot one right now, gets me hot under the collar. 

First of all, my heart, thoughts, and prayers go out to the Sandy Hook shooting.  It was a dispicable act of violence done by one person. What irritates me is that now the anti-gunners want to exploit this and use it to get more laws passed to further an agenda.  What confuses me is, why is it OK for people to go out of their way to take my Constitutional rights away, but keep the ones that support their needs? 

You have the newspaper in Conneticut that posted personal information of CCW holders. I think that is a blatant violation of privacy. And the people who's information was put out in public, should fight back and sue the paper.  What is the difference between that information getting put out, than say putting the people who work for the papers' SSNs out for public viewing. It's dispicable behavior, but to those ass holes out there the ends justify the means. 

Saw an article on Bloomberg in regards to the online sale of firearms and I about blew a gasket. Again, anti-gunners do not do any research.  First of all any reputable online gun auction or online seller will not send the controlled item of a firearm without getting a fax from the FFL of your choosing to go through the proper steps and legal steps to own that rifle or pistol. And WILL ONLY SEND IT TO AN FFL HOLDER and they must prove they have the proper credentials. 

Yes, you can purchase a gun online, but it has to be sent to an FFL if it is the controlled part of the rifle or pistol. Let me explain:

1) Say you want to buy an AR15 upper (the part with the barrel. Doesnt include the receiver, handle, and stock), you can do so online and have it sent to your house. This is because you have to have the lower in addition to the upper to actually have the rifle to shoot. If you bought only the ar15 lower, even with out the upper, that item has to be SHIPPED TO AN FFL and state and federal paperwork has to be filled out. It isn't as easy as you make it out to be. 

2) For a pistol, well a semi-auto pistol to be more precise. You can by the slide online and have it sent to your house, but if you buy only the frame (the part with the handle) you still have to have that item SENT TO AN FFL and fill out the required paperwork. 

3) If you buy a machine gun, that has to be sent to an authorized CLASS 3 dealer. You would then fill out the required paperwork, submit fingerprints, get permission from your state police, have paperwork sent to ATF, wait 6 months. That is after you get checked out to make sure you aren't a bad or evil person. 

Do I think the person who did the shooting is a POS? Yes. What I don't understand is that why do anti-gun people seem to not get the fact that there are evil people in this world.  Why do they feel they have the right to take my 2nd amendment rights away, at the same time calling me paranoid? If i'm paranoid because I have guns, why do you purchase life, flood, earthquake, and other supplemental insurance? I get the fact that some insurance is required, which I still think is BS too. 

That's it for today boys and girls. Till next time. Until then say your prayers, kiss your significant other and hope for the best. It's a new year and new challenges are coming. 

Happy New Year everyone. 

I honestly don't care if you are gay, lesbian, etc. I don't care, but why does it feel that people being gay is being forced down my throat. Heterosexual people don't go around and yell "STRAIGHT PRIDE", and go out of their way to show PDA (public display of affection).

Now that the military did away with DADT, now more and more LGBTs in the military aren't just asking for special privileges, but pretty much demanding it. There is a story of a female soldier doing a sex change, using our tax payer money. I don't agree with it due to my religion and the fact that my tax money is being used to pay for that change.  Military medical and pay is funded by our tax money remember.

see:

http://cnsnews.com/news/article/lesbian-soldier-begins-sex-change-process-during-deployment-afghanistan

and

http://militarytimes.com/news/2012/10/PRIME-military-deployed-to-war-zone-soldier-begins-sex-change-101512w

What this lady has, is actually an identity disorder, but since she if the first one in the military to do this, I'm sure she will be hailed as another "hero" because she is fighting the establishment.  Maybe we should have STRAIGHT PRIDE DAY as well, since everyone claims that they want equality. If that is the case, then lets have equality not entitlements.

Sorry it has been awhile since I wrote last, but it's been a crazy and busy few months.  Not sure what to really talk about, so I will give my opinion on the upcoming tax debacle.

First of all, I just wish that the Republicans would just allow the crash to happen. This way the Democrats can hang themselves and not have the ability to blame anyone, but themselves. I'm so sick of the he said she said crap.  I don't care for either party right now to be honest, but I do lean more to the right.  I don't like the Dem party for the only reason that they want to raise taxes. Basically this is the government taking money from my wallet and giving it over to someone I don't know mainly because they want votes.

People tell me that I'm wrong, but how am I wrong with this way of thinking? The Administration says that they want to tax the rich more so they pay their fair share. First of all, look at the UK. More and more people who make over 1 Million pounds, seem to be either leaving the country or making less money due to a 50p tax increase. Is this what we can expect in the US.  Take a look at this news article
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/9707029/Two-thirds-of-millionaires-left-Britain-to-avoid-50p-tax-rate.html to see what I'm talking about. This isn't from Fox News or CNN, but from the Telegraph.

No matter what, the rich are going to get out of paying more taxes due to great and wonderful loopholes within the tax laws. It is going to fall on the middle class to make up the difference. I don't care what Obama says, these new tax hikes are  going to affect only the middle class because we are responsible people who want to keep our way of life and to do so we must keep our jobs and pay our taxes so that we don't loose more money out of our accounts. Who else is going to pay for Obama Care, Medicare, and the Democratic votes that Obama got during the last election after he pretty much promised FREE money to?

Something recently came to my attention through the news, which in a way really burned me up. It is what Costas said during a NFL game regarding gun ownership. I'm very pro 2nd Amendment and I'm sorry, I'm really tired of anti-gun people giving inaccurate information when it comes to guns and using fear to promote their agenda.  

I'm sorry, guns can't kill anyone without the person who is in "control" of it making a conscience effort on their part to do the crime or provide themselves protection. I don't care what anyone say's, a gun can't jump up on its own and start shooting people. Guns can't make anyone go crazy as soon as they pick it up to make them go on a rampage. Thats like saying if I pick up a knife in the kitchen I'm going to start stabbing people just because it is in my hands. Its stupid to say such a thing.

I heard today on the news, and unfortunately I forgot the person who said it, but the problem with gun crime today isn't the gun itself, but people not taking responsibility for their actions. I also want to add that anti-gun people purposely take away a persons responsibility for what they did to push an agenda with fear.  I'm for everyone, even the anti-gunners, to have the right to self defense and protection heck even be able to us use it recreationally.  

People who go out of their way to promote their anti-gun agenda is the same as me promoting limits on their free speech. I don't see any difference. They want me to have a permit to own a gun, get it registered, go through a bunch of paperwork before I was able to bring it home and then in some states have a waiting period before I can even take a handgun home, maybe we should do the same to their freedom of speech to see how they like having a permit to speak, requesting permission to voice their opinion, etc. That to me is the same as Communism, but when you mention that they get all defensive. 

Maybe that is what pro-gunners should so, go on their soap box to limit free speech and see how these guys like it.  Then maybe when we show them a different way of looking at things especially when it comes to the US Constitution. 

I just wish these anti-gun people stopped looking at the 2nd Amendment in fear, and look at it as empowerment that is actually given to you by the Constitution. 

Till next time....

I want everyone to go to this website  and ask yourself something. Why does it seem that Democratic supporters are the dumbest people in the world, and willing to bend over for anyone who does this country and its citizens harm?

It seems that this admin doesn't give a crap that four Americans died in this attack and they say that this wouldn't be a big deal if Romney/Ryan didn't keep bringing it up. What the fuck over?!!!!! What does it take for the administration to say this was an actual attack? Does it take 5, 10, 100, 1000 Americans to die before they actually give a flying fuck?  It just pisses me off the more I think about it.

I admit, I was pretty pissed to hear the response that was given from the admin after it happened, now that it is still ongoing at a totally new level just sickens me.  Do the liberal dems really want to have another country come in and take over? Do they want these piss ant terrorists to make our country look bad and as Ryan said last night during the debate that the current admin portrays us as a weak country. I totally agree. I don't understand how this admin can even say they actually have a foreign policy and at the same time say they are doing everything they can to protect us from enemies foreign and domestic. I'm just saying.

Lee

You know I was thinking, I probably should start sharing this blog with friends to see what happens. I am friends with people who have different political ideas and beliefs. Maybe we can get this up to the level that it used to get (heated) when I worked with Nichole.  Since we have went our separate ways, those discussions have died down and I miss them. So maybe I should post on Google + a URL about this link and see where it goes.