Sunday, April 21, 2013

Voter registration

We conservatives need to make sure that we are all registered voters. Romney would have won if it wasn't for his supporters not being registered voters. You have to understand that the left will do anything in their power, even vote more than once, to get their exalted one in power. After all the Democratic party is the Santa Claus to these people. We have to make sure that we get out there and do the same. I'm guilty just as others are. This time around I'm not going to let that happen again. 2014 is coming up and 2016 is soon after. So we better do what we can to make sure our votes are counted and put someone in who is going to preserve our liberties.

Obama all Cozy With Putin?

All I can ask is why in the hell is President Obama all cozy with Vladimir Putin? Doesn't make sense. Read the following store at the URL provided. http://thecable.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2013/04/19/obama_thanks_putin_for_help_in_boston

Saturday, April 20, 2013

More than one gun bill as part of pro/anti gun control

Hey people, please take in mind that there are multiple gun bills going in front of the Senate. I thought that they were all in one bill, go to www.senate.gov to check them out. Do it now, it's your civic duty.

Assault Weapons Ban

President Obama, in light of recent issues that has happened in the last week with the gun bills failing in the Senate and a terrorist attack in Boston, I think you need to worry more about protecting this country than having a hissy fit and crying because the people spoke maintaining our 2nd Amendment rights. When is it going to stop with you? You are pissed because you and Feinstein didn't get your way, so you are going to act like all socialist liberals act, and basically use your Presidential rights to limit ours. I don't think you understand that doing so will hurt any chance the Democrats have of gaining votes during the next election cycle, especially 2014. I also believe that doing what you want to do to limit the 2nd Amendment, using Executive power, will have major repercussions come in 2016. As a whole, the country isn't socialist or communist as you want us to believe. You use deceit and slight of hand to push your agenda. You, as a political head voted in by the people (somehow) have used your power to limit our rights since you have been in office. I think the Democratic controlled Senate understands that if they piss us off to much, they will no longer have a job. This is your last term, but what you are doing will affect the presidential election in 2016. Just sayin' Me.

Thursday, April 4, 2013

Letter to Sen Warner

I wrote Senator Warner in regards to the 2nd Amendment and that he should oppose any law that goes against our Constitutional rights. 

Sen. Warner,
I received your message April 4, 2013 regarding a comment that I sent you a few weeks ago in regards to the 2nd Amendment and how I feel about the matter. However, the message I received seemed to be a template that others have received as well, but I feel that I have to respond to the template letter that was sent to me.
The 2nd Amendment rights were put into place not to guarantee our hunting rights; as GOV Quomo would like many of us to believe. The citizens have the 2nd Amendment as defense against a tyrannical government, foriegn or domestic. What gets me is what part of "shall not be infringed" do you and other elected officials don't understand? The Constitution was written in a way that anyone, even a kid, could read and understand.

Yes, what happened to those kids in CT is a tragedy however, why should law abiding citizens have to pay for Adam Lanza's crime? Why do Senators like Sen. Feinstein feel that law abiding citizens have to pay for what a few people have done in recent history?  Again, what part of "shall not be infringed" do you and other elected officials don't understand? Why are those that are for gun control work feverishly to restrict law abiding citizens rights to gun ownership, but don't do anything to punish those that cause harm to their fellow man? 
 ​Now that some states have started to pass some strict gun control laws, when is the absurdity going to stop? What is going to happen when something else as crazy happens? Confiscation, because it's for the children?
 
In your reply, you mentioned that our 2nd Amendment rights come with limitations, does that also mean that the rest of the Constitution come with limitations as well?  Does our freedom of speech, press, the right to petition the government for redress of grievances, and religion also come with limitations? What about the 4th Amendment, do our rights that protect us from illegal search and seizure also come with limitations? What kind of person, who serves the people of this nation is open to these so called limitations to our Constitutional rights? If the 2nd Amendment is taken away or limited (infringed), what guarantees the citizens of this country that our other Constitutional rights aren't infringed? The more I think about it, who's side is the government really on anyway? The criminal or the citizen? Your actions show the criminal. Do you believe that because new laws or restrictions that are put in place are going to make criminals not use a gun to rob someone who is unarmed? Do you, and other's with the same mindset, really believe that limiting law abiding citizens' 2nd Amendment rights, is going to curb the criminal element? Pot, heroin, crack, cocaine is already illegal. People are getting arrested daily for the sale, use, and purchase of those items. They are illegal, but it isn't keeping illegal drugs out of America. 
 
You mentioned that the NRA rated you an "A",  I don't really care what the NRA ranked you as, you still have a duty to uphold and defend the Constitution. To me having an "A" rating basically tells me that you got an "A" for showing up to do your job. Either you are for the 2nd Amendment in it's entirety or you're not at all. Simple as that, there isn't any middle ground on this issue and the same goes for the rest of the Constitution.  
I do think that if someone is currently on some heavy or strong, doctor prescribed drugs, they shouldn't be allowed to purchase a rifle or pistol, while they are taking the prescription.  Why should the use of legal doctor prescribed drugs pretty much dictate when you should be allowed to protect yourself or others? Adam Lanza, the Aurora theater shooter, and others who committed crimes of this magnitude were all on doctor prescribed psychotic drugs.

When it comes to the anti-gun people using false or wrong information to prove their point I don't see you, as an NRA "A" rated politician, correcting the person when wrong information is being repeated by other politicians.  If you were a true believer in the 2nd Amendment, you would be more vocal. All people who serve in an elected government role (local, state, and federal) should remember that it was the people, or citizens, that put them in that role and those elected officials answer to the people not the President or a lobbyist. The Constitution is pretty cut and dry and it seems that the "smartest" people in the world can't seem to wrap their brain around that thought. 

Saturday, March 30, 2013

I know it has been a while since I posted and well, I have nothing to say. These last few months has had me so pissed off with what is going on in Washington that I couldn't even fathom a sentence.

What really gets me is the huge fight against our 2nd Amendment rights. Who the fuck gives the right to our government to just arbitrarily take those away? I am actually hearing that Biden is working hard to actually confiscate them. I thought the Supreme Court of the land has already said that infringing on gun rights is un-Constitutional. What the fuck gives our government the right to do anything like that? You have federal agencies such as DHS buying a shit ton of ammo. They say the need it for training. I call bullshit. Even though most agencies do buy ammo, they don't need millions and billions of rounds because not everyone uses a gun. I see the argument that what the DHS bought only gives 100 per agent. Since when does DHS, DOD, and others use hollow points? All government training is done using ball ammo, not hollow points. I even read that these agents train with actually what they use, that is such bullshit. I know for a fact that no one (maybe a very select few) in any government agency trains with hollow points. It's too expensive, what the DHS is doing is just buying ammo to stock pile it so that the citizens can't have it or drive the cost up to where the average citizen can't afford it.   If that is not a direct violation of our rights I don't know what it.

You know, I think that if there is a total gun confiscation it wouldn't last long. I think that the people would have had a enough and a few things will come of it.  Those who are for gun rights will actually start creating their own towns and what not, arm themselves, and live free prosperous lives which the Constitution protects.  The anti-gun sheeple will live in their utopia, but hate life non the same only because everything they do is forced on them by the government they created.

Election time is coming, and I hope that all of us pro gun people band together and make sure that these tyrants do not make it into office again.  What is going to happen if they do confiscate all of the guns? I think that would push people over the edge, but in a bad way.

We just have to work really hard to get and KEEP these tyrants out of office, there is an election coming up and I hope this is used to our advantage as a wake up call to those politicians.  If they don't do what we want, then you will be looking for another job. They work for us and I think that those politician forget that.


Till next time fuckers...



Saturday, January 12, 2013

Dear Pierce Morgan,

Since you have no clue as to why we have the 2nd Amendment I will explain this in a way your "elite pseudo-intellectual" ass can understand it.

The reason we have the 2nd Amendment is because of your government imposing absolute authority on the Colonists here. Your government during the pre-Revolution did some pretty jacked up stuff to our forefathers so those actions were the template as to why our government and Constitution was written the way it was.

Honestly, the anti-gun politicians seem to show that they don't care how much crime is in the country because of guns or with the absence of guns.  To me it isn't about crime, they exploit actions such as the Aura shooting and the Sandy Hook shooting to move forward to a goal using the anti-gun agenda to reach that goal.  What their goal is I'm not sure, but with a democrat working on getting the term limits changed so presidents can do more than 2 terms; seems to be another agenda to meet a goal. That being said, the goal seems to take on a dictatorship or socialist agenda. Similiar to Chavez, Stalin, etc. Their President is "elected", but he ends up getting elected for over 8 years maintaining a control over the people.

I wish people like you would understand that if our government takes away our 2nd Amendment rights, you are not a citizen remember; then they can take away the rest of them or change them in a way that is beneficial to a socialist government. They are already doing that now.  Why would the government be concerned about video games and what is on TV now?

The 1st Amendment basically states that we have the freedom of press, speech, religion (not from religion), peaceful assembly, and redress (the government with our concerns).  The government put VP Biden in charge to "look" into this issue and already starting  the process to "nickel and dime" our 1st Amendment rights,  like they have been doing with the 2nd Amendment without having to actually voting to get rid of the Amendment.  These liberal types consider those like me to be Puritans and not sophisticated, but do everything in their power to limit my rights. Then they get Hollywood on board to make PSA's and they are just as dumb because in their films and movies there is a lot of violence. How else would they make their money right now?  What they don't understand is that the Hollywood types are just pawns, and nothing more.

I saw the video of when you were interviewing Jesse Ventura. He compared gun deaths to drunk driver deaths and you said that it doesn't compare. Well, if the car or gun is a tool that has to have human intervention to work, then it is a valid argument.  Neither a car or gun can jump up on it's own and start shooting people or drive itself to kill people by running them over. I think you are smart enough to understand that...at least I hope you and others like you are.

I will say this though before I close. You are here in this country as a guest. Since when does your opinion on our matters mean anything anyway? Would you like it if there was a hot debate in your home land and an American was on the "tele" viewing their opinion? I doubt that you wouldn't get a little upset about that.

I heard a quote on a show listen to all the time and it sets the scene perfectly. "Socialism is for the people, not the socialist".  If it was for equality, Chaves's family would be suffering the same way the rest of the Venezuelans are.  Michael Moore and others like them would give up millions of their earned dollars to be equal to the rest of us. I don't see them doing that, so I guess they (Hollywood) also consider us as nothing more than peasants as well.

Pro 2nd Amendment Enthusiast,
Political Throat Punch